Scott's Mixtape Substack

Scott's Mixtape Substack

Share this post

Scott's Mixtape Substack
Scott's Mixtape Substack
Was Neyman's 1923 Potential Outcomes Notation Originally for Continuous Treatments?
History of Economics

Was Neyman's 1923 Potential Outcomes Notation Originally for Continuous Treatments?

scott cunningham's avatar
scott cunningham
Mar 07, 2024
∙ Paid
3

Share this post

Scott's Mixtape Substack
Scott's Mixtape Substack
Was Neyman's 1923 Potential Outcomes Notation Originally for Continuous Treatments?
9
Share

I am in Cologne Germany at GESIS teaching a five day workshop on diff-in-diff. On the first day, roughly four or five people requested that I cover continuous diff-in-diff. As I hadn’t planned to, I’ve been trying to get the last part of the Callaway, Goodman-Bacon and Sant’Anna paper prepped. I’m basically having a hard time with my attention span la…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Scott's Mixtape Substack to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 scott cunningham
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share