Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Pawel Jozefiak's avatar

Honestly, seeing my piece pop up in your tabs made my morning. But the part that got me thinking was your Congressional speech analysis. That's exactly the kind of use case most people overlook. Everyone's building chatbots while the real power is in letting these tools chew through datasets that would take a human researcher weeks.

Your point about democratizing research hits hard. I've seen firsthand how a solo developer with the right tools can now do work that used to require a team. Not perfectly, not every time. But the gap is closing fast.

One thing I'd push back on slightly: "Anthropic loyalist" is generous. I just happened to find real, measurable differences when I actually tested the tools side by side. Plenty of failures along the way too. That's what makes the comparison honest.

Dr Sam Illingworth's avatar

Thanks, Scott, for another great mix. In particular, I think the point you made about Ethan Mollock's observation not to use other people's skill files in Claude is a great one. In many instances, there's just no need either. You can have, as you know, just a dialogue with Claude Code to help you determine the skills that you need.

One thing that I've been doing recently is getting Claude to read its own documentation manuals and make sure that it's up to date with using all of the various features in a way that improves both of our workflows. Thanks again for the great read, and have a wonderful weekend when it comes.

No posts

Ready for more?